blog.ryara.net

Here’s a riddle i found somewhere:

There’s a club. Anyone can join the club.
If they can answer the doormans question.
A man who wants to join stands near the door and listens to the doorman.
A member walks up to the doorman and the doorman says,
“Twelve.”
The member replies, “Six.”
The doorman lets him in.
Another member walks up to the doorman. The doorman says,
“Six.”
The member replies, “Three.”
Feeling confident, the man wanting to join walks up to the doorman.
The doorman says, “Ten.”
The non-member replies, “Five.”
The doorman tells him to leave.
Why?

I haven’t figured out the answer myself yet – but I hope I eventually do. Meanwhile, you may comment if you have a hint of some sort or think you’ve got the answer ;) .

THE ALGORITHM CONSTANTLY FINDS JESUS
THE ALGORITHM KILLED JEEVES
THE ALGORITHM IS BANNED IN CHINA
THE ALGORITHM IS FROM JERSEY

Not long ago I when I was iritated because µtorrent’s UPnP port mapping wasn’t working when Hamachi is installed, I got an idea – which probably is stupid or crazy for one reason or another, but whatever. The idea is that instead of letting applications themselves communicate via the network interfaces themselves, a “unified” one could be provided, instead they speak with “unified interface” which then decides the best route for the packages (the “nearest” or fastest one). It would also make switching from one network interface to another – if you for example want to go from wireless to wired while still keeping all your connections alive. This would also make the local ip to always be the same, seen from applications, which I believe could be a good thing.
This is (in at least some ways) similiar to using a VPN, but without some of the drawbacks (though with some others instead, I guess).
So, at the moment, this seems like a good idea to me – but it could just as well be the opposite.

I recently got a comment on a post I wrote quite a while ago. It was from someone who had though about the same thing, and decided to make a whole site about it. While I do not believe that their effort will make a very big difference (at least not enough to do very much about it), I think it is a good thought (and initiative). So, I can at least write about it and hope that someone who would believe enough in it reads it and tries to do something about it.

Lately in sweden there’s been quite much talk about Scandic’s decision, for example: one[1], two[2].
I must say I can’t fully agree with either one’s view of the issue. Skytte is mostly wrong; first I can’t see why he does not accept that people acctually can feel insulted because there’s a bible in their hotel room. On the other hand I myself can’t understand why one would be insulted because of it – after all it’s merely a book, a fictional one. Secondly I do not see why he should have a right to decide what Scandic should do – they’re a company, and as such can do as they wish, they have all rights to decide what should be in their hotel rooms. Also, they have probably also counted with the probable reduction in guests due to the change, as they’re profit driven. As for buissnessmen which he names as an example, I’d guess aren’t chosing where to live themselves when travelling, but by their companies. Lastly, I’ve personally not seen the daily insults directed against christianity which he mentions.
Even though I am an humanist, and a atheist (though I must admit I’m more of an agnostic), I can not say I agree with what Sturmark writes, most of it is total rubbish… But in the last paragraph he makes a very good point: he proposes to provide a small library in the reception of the hotels’ which has a collection of a variety of books, both religious and non-religious ones. This, I think, should be a solution that works for both christians, atheists and others.