Today, with spyware, viruses and their friends circulating everywhere you only have two choices: getting an antivirus software or getting infected, and for the majority of us go for the first. However, most companies who produce antivirus today seems to have missed something very important. Yes, you want to have a computer free of malware, but you don’t want the software that makes it stay that way impact on performance. I’ve seen far too many examples of antivirus that has excessive CPU usage when you’re copying files or extracting large archives. Among these are: McAfee, Panda, F-secure, Norton; many of the major antivirus vendors. The only one that I’ve found so far that suits this simple need is NOD32, which I’m quite happy with though it’s GUI lacks some features. Another feature that I miss in some of them is the option to exclude certain files and folders (The only one I can remeber missing this is Panda). I think the antivirus companies should focus more on the purpose of their software (Doing it’s job in the bakground without being noticed) instead of eyecandy which there’s quite a lot of in most antvirus products today.
Categories
Archives
- June 2010 (1)
- April 2010 (1)
- December 2009 (2)
- November 2009 (1)
- August 2009 (1)
- March 2009 (2)
- February 2009 (1)
- January 2009 (1)
- July 2008 (1)
- June 2008 (1)
- April 2008 (1)
- March 2008 (1)
- February 2008 (3)
- December 2007 (2)
- October 2007 (1)
- September 2007 (1)
- August 2007 (3)
- July 2007 (4)
- June 2007 (2)
- May 2007 (2)
- April 2007 (5)
- March 2007 (1)
- February 2007 (2)
- January 2007 (2)
- November 2006 (1)
- September 2006 (1)
- August 2006 (1)
- July 2006 (2)
- April 2006 (1)
- October 2005 (1)
- August 2005 (2)
have you ever tested Kaspersky? :)
Kaspersky ftw! although the latest version (after merging private and private pro) seems a little bit slower